Quote Originally Posted by verbalni_fajter View Post
paaaa dobo, ako misliš da taj monstum od motora može da iskoristi prednosti goriva od 100 oktana, ok

i za 98 oktana u CG ima tek nekoliko desetina ili stotina vozila u cijeloj CG koja po specifikaciji traže 98 oktana.

Za čipovana vozila ima smisla ić na stotku, moooožda
U pocetku sam sipao 98 na eko a ina ima 95 ili 100.

ne radi se iskoriscavanju goriva u smislu da ce bolje ici 100 vs 98 nego o kvalitetu,

100 octane fuel is considered "safer" than 95 octane for specific, high-performance engines because it has a
higher resistance to pre-ignition and auto-ignition, often referred to as engine knocking or pinging. The higher the octane number, the more compression and heat the fuel can withstand before it burns, making it more stable under intense engine conditions. Wikipedia +3

Here is why 100 octane can be safer, specifically for high-performance engines:[COLOR=var(--attr-link-color)]
[/COLOR]

  • Prevents Detonation (Knocking): High-performance engines (often with high compression ratios or turbochargers) generate intense heat and pressure. If the fuel ignites too early (pre-ignition), it causes "knock," which can cause significant damage to pistons and cylinder heads.
  • More Stable Combustion: 100-octane fuel has a slower flame front speed, allowing for a more controlled, efficient combustion process rather than a premature explosion.
  • Reduced Risk Under Load: Under high loads, such as high RPM, driving in extreme heat, or towing, 100 octane ensures the engine does not experience pre-detonation.