Formula 1!

[massa]

UH Fabia i ti znas da ocijenis vozaca.

[kimi pg]

pod uslovom da nema nikog u repu, inače ode u livadu.. a što se mene tiče, to što ne voli da rizikuje mu je mana.. mada mu taj luksuz nije potreban za sad sa ovakvim bolidom!

[massa]

http://www.rediff.com/sports/slide-s...s/20110618.htm Alonso peti sportista na svijetu po zaradi

[verbalni_fajter]

PKV.

Namjerno sam i stavio tu, prica sto puta ispricana, a niko ne pominje kad mu je NAJVECI vratio isto prepustivsi mu mjesto.

ON i on jos jednom !

da mu nije prepustio i bodove za to prvo mjesto???

[Fabia_Elegance!]

Opet ovaj.
Bodove je registrovao kompjuter zato sto je NAJVECI prosao 1-2 sec prije Barichella.

A da nije imao ta dva boda, te godine ne bi bio sampion:

[verbalni_fajter]

tim gore, jer je veca pizda ispao, uz toliku prednost je ipak pristao da nezasluzeno Barikelu uzme pobjedu Sto nije apelovao da se Barikelu daju bodovi, nego ga je samo pustio da se popne na podijum?

[Fabia_Elegance!]

Zato sto ne moze, jer je presao cilj prije njega, to je registrovao komp, to se mijenja samo u slucaju kazne.

Aj sad, cao.

[verbalni_fajter]

a sto je prolazio uopste, ta ljudska gromada, taj epitom sportskog duha? GTFO

[Petronas]

Zato sto je timska odluka biseru. NAJVECI je full posvecen timu.

[Fabia_Elegance!]

Kaze, sto je prolazio, ne, trebao je da stane i da pita: oces li da prodjes tu crtu?
Stoka.

[JUAN]

dosta ce josh vode proteci dok se ne rodi vozac onakvih performansi kao shto je HAMO(legenda)

[verbalni_fajter]

Zato sto je timska odluka biseru. NAJVECI je full posvecen timu.

pa sto je onda zaradio kaznu timu na istu trku, kad je full posvecen?

shumi je vazda bio full posvecen sebi, no aj

[Petronas]

FABIA, podsjeti me na najsvetiju opciju na forumu.

[Fabia_Elegance!]

Smrde na ignore...


Onda, fuliras post slikama KAISER-a:

[verbalni_fajter]

to u psiholoZiji zovu "zivjeti u zabludi"

[massa]

http://www.f1technical.net/forum/vie...php?f=1&t=9909

[verbalni_fajter]

mogao je bburago za sitne pare da uzme

[Fabia_Elegance!]

Formula 1 teams have been told that the reactive suspension system pioneered by
Lotus has been banned for the 2012 season.
Sources have confirmed that a note was sent from the FIA to all teams on
Friday evening indicating that the governing body was no longer satisfied the
concept - which regulates ride height under braking - was still legal.

It is not clear why the FIA has decided now that the reactive systems should
be outlawed, after AUTOSPORT revealed last week that it had given the green
light to the Lotus idea as long ago as last January.

Rival teams are likely, however, to have made an effort to prove to the FIA
that the Lotus system was in contravention of the regulations.

News of the FIA ban was first broken on The Flying Lap
webcast, when Williams chief operations engineer Mark Gillan said on
Friday night he had received a note from the governing body shortly before going
on air notifying him of the move.

"The FIA has just banned that particular type of system," he said.

Speaking about Williams' efforts on the device, Gillan said: "We have been
investigating that type of system for a while. It obviously has an impact on the
aero platform of the car, [and] anything that gets the front ride height lower
is beneficial from an aerodynamic perspective."

The reactive suspension system on the Lotus was first spotted at last year's
Abu Dhabi Young Driver Test, and helped maintain the front ride height under
braking for corners – to benefit both aerodynamic performance and stability.

Rivals teams were quick to look into the system, with Ferrari understood to
be the first to propose its own version of reactive ride to the FIA.

Ferrari team principal Stefano Domenicali had said at his team's Wrooom media
event in Italy last week that he was awaiting a response from the governing body
on its legality.

He said: "What you are talking about, is more related to having stability
under braking. It is a system that I know there have been some documents in
writing between the FIA and the teams.

"We are waiting for the final confirmation if this kind of devices will be
acceptable or not. But for sure we are looking around these sorts of devices to
see if they contribute to a performance. But we need to wait and see what will
be the reaction to the FIA on that."

Only this week, Red Bull Racing team principal Christian Horner had said he
was unsure about the ultimate benefits of the system.

"It's like all of these things, it's about how they work and how they are
integrated in the car," Horner told AUTOSPORT. "Things have to work as a package
rather than as individual components. It appears to be an interesting concept
but I'm the wrong person to be commenting on it."

When asked if he thought it was legal, he said: "I haven't had that close a
look at it. That's more a question for [F1 race director] Charlie Whiting."

The Lotus system was mechanical and activated by brake torque. And, because
it was part of the suspension system, was deemed legal at the time because it
could not be classified as a moveable aerodynamic device.




Lotus

[verbalni_fajter]

dobro, nije im puno trebalo da se odluce je li legalan ili nije, "samo" 12 mjeseci.

[NSX]

i te milione sto su ulozili u razvoj sad mogu bacit, ko im je kriv sto nisu McLaren i Ferrari...

[verbalni_fajter]

ili Mercedes, pa da ih Fabia i Petronas sad brane?

[Fabia_Elegance!]

i te milione sto su ulozili u razvoj sad mogu bacit, ko im je kriv sto nisu McLaren i Ferrari...

Jebes i to i to. RBR je glavni. Za njih ne postoji zakon.

[verbalni_fajter]

ako ces tako pausalno da tumacis, nije postojao ni za ferari dok su dominirali

[Fabia_Elegance!]

Renol i glava od Kimuse:

[SIZE=2] [/SIZE]

[Fabia_Elegance!]

"AUTOSPORT understands that Ferr is working on the front fDuct concept tried by Merc which redirects the airflow to cut drag at high speed"




Dalje, skica novog Ferkana:





Naprijed pushrod, kao Minardi iz 2001-e.