Quote:
Originally Posted by hercules
Pogledaj ovo:
http://www.imagebanana.com/img/m68t943/1.JPG
http://www.imagebanana.com/img/i420ezr/2.JPG
http://www.imagebanana.com/img/dsecwi9/3.JPG
Obrazlozi.
Printable View
Quote:
Originally Posted by hercules
Pogledaj ovo:
http://www.imagebanana.com/img/m68t943/1.JPG
http://www.imagebanana.com/img/i420ezr/2.JPG
http://www.imagebanana.com/img/dsecwi9/3.JPG
Obrazlozi.
e pa ovo je bezobrazluk svoje vrste.. Hulkenberg se zaabio u zid citavih sekund ipo prije nego li je naletio alonso sa 250 na sat preticuci ovg drugog nesretnika..
ja ne znam sto bi ti da ti kaze neko na ove tvoje slike..
ja mislim da bi ih ti sve diskvalifikovao samo da schumaer pobijedi :)
respekt za Kubicu prije svega:
Quote:
By Mark Hughes
BBC F1 commentary box producer
Robert Kubica's performance in Monaco underlined yet again why he is such a hot F1 property and why he continues to attract the close interest of Ferrari.
By putting his Renault on the front row and racing it to a podium place, Kubica completely transcended the car's level.
He has done this at most of the races this year but the nature of the Monte Carlo track translated this against the clock much more effectively.
At the more conventional circuits, where a car's aerodynamics are more important, Kubica has perhaps been squeezing out an extra couple of 10ths of a second from the car's natural level.
But at Monaco, where a driver's ability to repeatedly get up close to the barriers and commit to that precision with his corner-entry speed, he was worth much more than that.
The Renault's natural position appears to be battling for a top-10 qualifying place. The difference between that and the front row at Monaco was around 0.8secs.
"We know the car is nowhere being a front-row car yet," says Renault's engineering chief Alan Permane. "It's there because of Robert."
Red Bull, Ferrari and Mercedes all had intrinsically faster cars than Renault at Monaco and even though McLaren may not have, because their car's inability to 'switch on' its tyres was a limiting factor, Kubica should not have been qualifying better than seventh.
He was superbly committed and precise, using the car's stability to lean to an outrageous degree on the outer front tyre on the entry to a corner and maintaining that momentum all the way through to the exit barriers which he would shave by millimetres.
Pretty much every driver was able to do this at some stage in the Monaco weekend but only Kubica seemed to be able to do it on every corner for every lap without a hint of an error.
The Renault's consistency allowed him to get into a superb rhythm and the lack of ultimate downforce was not as significant as its good balance.
The team was delighted with the result, but one wonders if actually a win might have been possible.
In the final part of qualifying, Kubica and the team decided to do the conventional two runs on fresh tyres, whereas others - including pole-setter Mark Webber - opted to do just one multi-lap run, reasoning that the super-soft tyre was taking as long as three, even four, laps to get to its peak.
It was on Webber's third and fourth laps that he shaded Kubica's best, so did the Pole opt for the wrong tyre strategy? And, with track position counting for everything, did missing out on pole also cost him the win?
It's possible.
Team-mate Vitaly Petrov, before he crashed out of the second qualifying session, was doing his best times at the end of multiple-lap runs, but he was lapping between 0.5-1.0secs slower than Kubica.
It's likely, however, that at Kubica's pace the best of the new tyres was used up after two flying laps. Certainly, he felt so.
"On my last lap, I did a purple [fastest] sector one time but by the end of that lap my tyres were losing grip in the last sector," he said.
Gamble at start didn't pay-off - Kubica
The Renault's ability to instantly turn on its tyres played its part in Kubica being so consistently quick. That was probably incompatible with it being able to squeeze a third or fourth 'golden grip' new tyre lap.
In other words, Webber's method was probably best for the Red Bull, Kubica's for the Renault.
All of this will only increase Ferrari's interest in Kubica. He was approached by them as a stand-in after Felipe Massa was injured last year and now he is being looked at as a possible Massa replacement. It's easy to see why but it's not obvious whether Kubica would or should take up any offer to go there.
Renault is building up its team around him and improving in leaps and bounds.
Kubica is very much part of a renewed spirit within the team and there is a feeling they just might be able to build this into something special, a team where a second place on the grid and third in the race might count as a disappointing weekend rather than a thrilling one.
Mark Hughes has been an F1 journalist for more than 10 years. He is the award-winning author of several books.
"We know the car is nowhere being a front-row car yet," says Renault's engineering chief Alan Permane. "It's there because of Robert."Quote:
Originally Posted by verbalni_fajter
tačno tako, vozi opasno dobro sa osrednjim bolidom u karavanu.. već ga vide u ferariju sljedeće sezone sa alonsom!!
Zalosni bi popusio od njega, onda bi trazio da vozi za Ladu, opet.
Nova pravila, odma:
http://f1.gpupdate.net/en/formula-1-...ety-car-rules/
kako sad stvari sa formom stoje, tako bi bilo.. alonso ne prikazuje ni dio vožnje i agresivnosti koju je imao prvih godina u f1, kao npr: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSMAc...eature=relatedQuote:
Originally Posted by Fabia_Elegance!
Priznaju da su pravila konfuzna,eto koliko su oni ozbiljni...Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabia_Elegance!
Presmijesno je sto su ga kaznili,a nisu kaznili Alonsa i Barikela,ali dobro...
Tu mu je stvarno bilo tesko, 1,5 sec brzi bolid, staza Suzuka...Quote:
Originally Posted by kimi pg
P.S. nije agresivan? Jel to znaci da je ostario?
Od danas, novo ime za Zalonsog.
to je moje viđenje njegove trenutne forme, a što su mu razlozi ne znam.. možda ja griješim i on vozi najbolje što može, ali poslije sezona iz renoa očekivao sam više od njega u konkurentnom bolidu!Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabia_Elegance!
P.S. brži bolid - oćeš da kažeš da je msc pobjeđivao u sporijem ili bolidu koji je bio isti kao kod konkurencije?
Alonso nikako nije mogao biti vidovit i predvidjeti situaciju. Cim je Hilkenberg udario, upalilo se zuto i SC, pri brzini od 300km/h mislis li da je Alonso mogao da reaguje u dvije sekunde.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fabia_Elegance!
Daj malo budi objektivan.
Da, 1994-e, 1996-e, 1997-e, 1998-e, 2000-e, 2001-e, 2003-e i 2006-e.Quote:
Originally Posted by kimi pg
Quote:
Originally Posted by montenegrina
Kakvih 300 na sat? O cemu pricas?
Mogao je da uspori, jer ovaj se zabio u zid 2,5 sec prije ove prve slike.
Alonso revealed after the race that he wanted to attack Hamilton once the Safety Car returned to the pits on the last lap but his team ordered him not to do it.
However, according to BBC pit-lane reporter Ted Kravitz Schumacher - who was slapped with a 20-second penalty for the overtaking move - told his Mercedes team that the Spaniard was caught napping.
'I'm reliably informed Michael was on the radio on the slowing down lap telling the team how Alonso was asleep, a phrase team principal Ross Brawn repeated later in our interview at the end of the BBC One show,' Kravitz wrote on his BBC blog.
Despite his penalty in Monaco, Kravitz also believes Schumacher will happy that he proved he still has "that edge".
'While Schumacher will be annoyed at the FIA's interpretation of the confusing rule 40.13, which they have now said needs to be re-written, he will be happy to sit back this week and know that he's still got that edge, and it's getting sharper every race.'
dobro dosao verbalni
Nova sasija za Vettela:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/83744
Cool :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by HIPER
Pa poslije konacnog priznanja obozavalaca Sumija, da je isti zasrao, sad je normalno da se traze u drugim krivica.
Fabia bi znao da se Hulkenberger tacno zabio 400m ispred i odma bi prikocio i stao iza Chandoka na pojavu SC a to je bilo par sekundi prije?;)
E, a zasto onda mijenjaju pravilnik?
koliko su puta izmijenili pravilnik zbog NAJVECEG SERONJE
Statistike po krugovima, MC... NAJVEĆEG i Nika...
Michael Schumacher Nico Rosberg
Qualifying position 7 6
Qualifying time comparison (Q3) 1′14.590 (+0.046) 1′14.544
Race position 12 7
Average race lap 1′25.116 (+0.244) 1′24.872
Laps 78/78 78/78
Pit stops 1 1
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-conten...5/mercedes.gif
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-conten...-8-470x313.jpg
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-conten...-2-470x646.jpg
Quote:
Originally Posted by JUAN
Pa jesu nekoliko puta. Recimo prije je bilo ako si dobio Stop and Go kaznu mogao si da udjes u box i da odradis to kad god si htio, do kraja trke.
Znas sto se dogodilo u Silverstone 1998-e? NAJVECI je bio ispred Mike, ne znam tacno za koliko ali za nekih 10 sec, bilo je oko 20 krugova i NAJVECI je usao u pit za nove gume i za benzin, i dirao je liniju boxa i odmah je dobio Stop and Go kaznu (kao u Catalunju 2002-e, zbog jebenog Montazera) i onda je vozio do kraja i usao je u pit pred kraj zadnjeg kruga i zavrsio trku u pit, kao prvi. Zamisli ti tu logiku!!! Odmah su izmijenili pravila, ako dobijes S and G kaznu moras u box u naredna tri kruga.
Onda, 2002-e, NAJVECI je imao 2 puta vise bodova od drugoplasiranog, i za 2003-u su uveli novi nacin bodovanja - 10, 8, 6...
Onda pocetkom 2005-e...
Eto, dobio si odgovor, ali na ovo nisam.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JUAN
Pa te opet pitam, na koga si tacno mislio?
Neshto si pomijeshao...
Two laps from the finish of the 1998 British Grand Prix, Michael Schumacher was leading the race when he was issued a stop-and-go penalty for overtaking a lapped car under a yellow flag. This penalty involves going into the pit lane and stopping for 10 seconds. But as the penalty was given with fewer than 2 laps remaining, and since it was issued as a handwritten note, the Ferrari team was confused as to whether the penalty was a stop and go penalty or merely a penalty of 10 seconds to be added to Schumacher's race time. The rules state that a driver must serve his penalty within three laps of the penalty being issued, and on the third lap after receiving the penalty, Schumacher turned into the pit lane to serve his penalty. However, this happened to be the last lap of the race, and Ferrari's pit box was located after the start/finish line, meaning that Schumacher finished the race before serving the penalty. The stewards initially resolved that problem by adding 10 seconds to Schumacher's race time.
U svoj priči meni jedna stvar nije jasna zašto su Šumiju oduzeli 20s kad je čojek totalno legalno pretekao Alonsa koji je sam sebi skočio u stomak tako što je proklizao svojom greškom i samim tim dozvolio da ga Šumi pretekne.....
Nevidim objašnjenje ako ga ko ima neka reče???
Quote:
Originally Posted by navigator
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=efZUy...layer_embedded